A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF BANA ALABED’S SPEECH: POWER, IDENTITY, AND RESISTANCE IN SYRIAN WAR NARRATIVES

Abstract

This study employs qualitative Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to observe how electricity, identity, and resistance are discursively built in Bana Alabed’s wartime speech inside Syrian war narratives. Moving past humanitarian and mawkish readings of child indication, the studies dissertation within hegemonic developments of global media, indispensable humanitarianism, and geopolitical power. The assessment is theoretically beached in Norman Fairclough’s 3- dimensional (3-D) model, approving a protected examination of textual, discursive, and socio- political dimensions. Drawing on a purposively decided on corpus of Bana Alabed’s tweets, mediated interviews, and public statements (2016–2018), the have a study adopts an interpretive qualitative method. Textual analysis focuses on transitivity, modality, evaluative language, and pronominal selections, even as discursive practice evaluation examines intertextuality, reconceptualization, and international glide via dominant media structures. At the extent of social exercise, the discourse is located inside the political economy of the Syrian warfare, highlighting how child subjectivity abilities as a semiotic useful resource in legitimizing specific humanitarian and geopolitical imaginaries and the findings display that Bana Alabed’s discourse produces a strategically ambivalent project role, functioning concurrently as symbolic resistance and as a discourse embedded interior asymmetrical global electricity circle of relatives contributors. By critically enticing with infant-mediated conflict narratives, this have a have a look at contributes to Critical Discourse Studies, warfare conversation, and postcolonial critiques of humanitarian discourse, demonstrating how resistance and domination can also coexist within the equal discursive formation.