A Study of the Interplay between Identity, Trauma, and Resistance in Postcolonial Literary Discourse

Authors

  • Shahid Hussain Assistant professor English, Federal Government Quaid e Azam College, Rawalpindi
  • Iqra Fida Senior Lecturer, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College Multan
  • Muhammad Rizwan Lecturer English, National College of Business Administration & Economics
  • Muhammad Nawaz Associate Professor, English Department, Northern University, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan

Abstract

This work examines the connections among identity, trauma, and resistance in postcolonial literary discourse, a topic that provides an enduring difficulty in thinking through the continued impact of colonial histories on individual and collective identities in postcolonial societies. Although much has been written about power, representation, and cultural conflict in postcolonial contexts, few studies have sought to discuss the interconnections between processes of identity formation, traumatic memory, and resistance in a single analytical framework. Postcolonial theory is used to inform the study, which explores the construction and negotiation of selfhood, oppression and agency in literary texts from the perspectives of Frantz Fanon, Edward Said and Homi K. Bhabha. A qualitative research methodology was used, which involved the use of the following texts from the postcolonial period: Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart, Tsitsi Dangarembga's Nervous Conditions, Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea, Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children, Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things and Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's A Grain of Wheat. Data gathered from secondary sources including books, peer-reviewed journal articles and academic databases. Themes of displacement, cultural hybridity, marginalization, historical memory, psychological trauma and resistance to colonial/neo-colonial structures are explored. The results suggest that in postcolonial discourses, identity is fluid, contested, and constantly negotiated and negotiated in the aftermath of trauma. Trauma is depicted not just as a result of colonial violence, but also as an impetus for resistance and self-affirmation. The quantitative results indicate that over 80% of the analyzed texts depict the role of trauma as a key part of identity reconstruction and about 75% of texts characterize resistance as a strategy for cultural recovery and empowerment. This work is a contribution to the growing fields of postcolonial literary discourse in that it shows how memory, resistance and identity are intimately connected in the construction of the postcolonial experience.

Keywords: Postcolonial Literature, Identity Formation, Trauma, Resistance, Cultural Hybridity, Literary Discourse, Postcolonial Theory

 

 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20581280

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28